Corruption vs Democracy
in Income-based Representation
4 years ago
The beauty of income-based representation such as tax-bracket apportionment is that it's not corruptable.
It is a policy not a divisive personality. It is a policy based on mathematics and statistics, not somebody's beliefs.
To sustain division, disinformation agents can warn of divisive efforts motivated to prevent corrective measures and necessary democratic reforms, which is itself divisive.
Allegiance to failed institutions is the problem. Questioning those failures is not divisive, it is corrective. Don't let the corrupt and biased propagandists fool you.
A better democracy, as would be achieved with more accurate repesentation, is not divisive. It would be more inclusive.
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
- No replies found for this topic.
